FROM OUR FACULTY
Thinking Biblically About Technology
Dr. Eileen Poh
May 2, 2026

Introduction
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is ubiquitous in our daily life. It gives us online recommendations, language translation, virtual customer support or chatbots, help in locating places and navigating our routes. It has many beneficial applications in healthcare, education, manufacturing, finance, logistics and other fields. On the downside, AI is used to disseminate misinformation and disinformation, enable frauds and scams, perpetuate bias and injustice. Ethical concerns are also raised about transparency and accountability.
The ongoing US/Israel-Iran war has raised questions about the use of AI for military purposes. The dispute between the Pentagon and Anthropic, which started earlier this year, has brought some ethical issues to the fore. [1] Anthropic insists that the Pentagon must comply with two non-negotiable guardrails when using their AI technology: no mass domestic surveillance of Americans, and no fully autonomous weapons that can kill people without meaningful human oversight. The Pentagon has rejected these guardrails. [2] On May 1, the Pentagon announced that they have reached agreements with seven leading AI companies to “accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force”. [3] These seven AI companies had agreed for their technology to be used by the US military “for any lawful use”.
In a recent lawsuit against Meta, which owns Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp, and Google, owner of YouTube, the jurors found that they “intentionally built addictive social media platforms” that harmed the 20-year-old plaintiff’s mental health. [4] Other similar cases have been brought against social media companies, seeking to hold them responsible for the addictive and harmful way they design their products.
Whether it is the use of AI in warfare or in our daily lives, how should Christians view such technology, indeed any form of technology? I suggest that we start with a biblical perspective on technology. I find the fourfold biblical framework used by John Stott helpful: it takes into consideration four elements of biblical history: creation, fall, redemption, and consummation or new creation. [5]
[1] See Nick Robins-Early, “What does the US military’s feud with Anthropic mean for AI used in war?”: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/07/anthropic-claude-ai-pentagon-us-military
[2] See Aryamehr Fattahi, “Pentagon. AI Integration and Anthropic: Ethics, Strategy, and the Future of Defence Technology Partnerships”: https://bisi.org.uk/reports (20/2/26). The Pentagon has declared Anthropic “a supply chain risk”, a designation which Anthropic is challenging in court.
[3] This is part of the statement issued by the Pentagon, as quoted in “Pentagon inks deals with seven AI companies for classified military work”: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/01/pentagon-us-military-pairs-with-spacex-google-openai
[4] See https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c747x7gz249o. Meta and Google are appealing against this decision.
[5] J. Stott, Issues Facing Christians Today (4th edn.; Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006) 62–64.
Creation
Firstly, we affirm that God is the creator of everything (Gen. 1–2). He made man and woman in his own image (Gen. 1:26–28). This implies that God has given human beings characteristics which reflect his own divine nature. As there is perfect love and communion in the Godhead, so men and women are capable of love, of relating with others, and with God. They are creative, and have free will, which is to be used to make just, merciful, loving, inclusive communities in harmony with the whole of God’s creation.
Part of bearing the image of God is being God’s representative to exercise dominion over God’s creation for the benefit of all creation. This dominion is to be exercised through working and taking care of God’s creation (Gen. 2:15). Wright uses the term “servant kings”: Dominion (Gen. 1) exercised through servanthood (Gen. 2). [4] Thus humans must treat God’s creation with care, love and responsibility.
[4] For servant-kingship, see C. Wright, Old Testament Ethics for the People of God (Leicester: IVP, 2004) 122-126.


Fall
Secondly, when Adam and Eve asserted their independence and rejected God (Gen. 3), the image of God in humankind was marred, and human thinking became corrupted. But sin has not erased the image of God in man, who is still accountable to God for the way he works and cares for God’s creation (Gen. 9:1–5).
According to Stott, our view of humankind must take “… equal account of the creation and the fall. It is this that constitutes ‘the paradox of our humanness’. We human beings have both a unique dignity as creatures made in God’s image and a unique depravity as sinners under his judgement…We can behave like God in whose image we are made, only to descend to the level of the beasts. We are able to think, choose, create, love and worship, but also to refuse to think, to choose evil, to destroy, to hate and to worship ourselves. We build churches and drop bombs.” [5]
We see examples of this “paradox of our humanness” in the accounts after the fall. Cain built a city (Gen. 4:17). His descendants made tents, kept livestock (Gen. 4:20), made musical instruments (Gen. 4:21), forged tools out of bronze and iron (Gen. 4:22). All these were possible because of man’s creativity and his use of God given resources to benefit God’s creation. But Lamech used excessive force to kill a man for wounding him, presumably with the tools designed for farming and building (Gen. 4:23).
Human sinfulness is displayed dramatically in the account of the Tower of Babel (Gen. 11:1-9). The people moved eastward and settled in Shinar. There they used God’s creative gifts and resources to make bricks and baked them thoroughly for the purpose of building for themselves a city with a tower that reached to the heavens. Their ambition was to make a name for themselves. Graham Houston calls this “a symbol of technology gone wrong, the result of the ingenuity of humankind in culling materials and using them for their own evil purposes.” [6] In his judgment, God scattered the people over the whole earth.
[5] Stott, Issues facing Christians today, 66–67.
[6] G. Houston, Virtual Morality: Christian Ethics in the Computer Age (Leicester: IVP, 1998) 69.
Redemption
Out of all these nations, God chose Abraham and promised to bless him, and make him into a great nation so that in him all peoples on earth would be blessed (Gen. 12:2–3). This is the third element in the biblical framework: redemption. After delivering the Israelites from slavery in Egypt, God declares, “… you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Ex. 19:6). As a kingdom of priests, Israel was to mediate between God and the nations. They would do this by obeying the Law (Deut. 4:5–8). Wright argues that because God is a morally consistent God, and He desires the nations to come to Him through Israel’s obedience of the law, what he requires of Israel must be based on principles that have universal validity. [7]
In Deut. 22:8, we find a little known law, which I think should be included in our biblical reflection on technology: “When you build a new house, make a parapet around your roof so that you may not bring the guilt of bloodshed on your house if someone falls from the roof.” This law can be seen as the concrete expression of the primary command to the Israelites to “love your neighbour as yourself” (Lev. 19:18). What objectives/principles can we draw from this law? The parapet was a safety feature that the owner of the house had to erect to protect people from falling off the roof. Those who did not make a parapet around the roof would be guilty of bloodshed if someone were to fall from the roof. The principle here is that designers and builders must include safety features or guardrails when they use technology to build systems, which must protect users and not cause them harm.
On their journey to the Promised Land, we see God blessed Abraham’s descendants by dwelling with them in the Tabernacle (Ex. 25:8, 22). But similar skills were used to cast the golden calf, which the Israelites worshipped (Ex. 32:1ff). [8]
Temple technology
Technology at its best can be seen in the building of the temple in Jerusalem during Solomon’s reign (1 Kings 5–8). The temple was the place where God’s people could meet Him, where they could worship him and bring their petitions, and where foreigners could come to pray to the God of Israel (1 Kings 8:28–53). But Jeroboam made two golden calves, set in Bethel and Dan, for the Israelites to worship (1 Kings 12:26–33). He also built temples, where sacrifices were offered to other gods. Other kings also made places and idols for worship, e.g., King Solomon built a high place for Chemosh, the detestable god of Moab, and for Molech the detestable god of the Ammonites (2 Kings 11:7–8); King Ahaz saw an altar in Damascus and ordered a similar altar to be made, where he offered sacrifices and offerings (2 Kings 16). Technology can be used to glorify God or for idolatry.
Because of their idolatry, which continued for many generations, God sent them into exile. After their return from exile, they rebuilt the temple for the Lord, for Solomon’s temple had been destroyed during the Babylonian invasion (Ezra 3:8–10; 6:14–16).
By the end of the Old Testament account, God’s promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:2–3 remained unfulfilled: they were no longer a great nation but subject to foreign powers, and they were certainly not a blessing to all peoples on earth.
In the fullness of time, Jesus Christ came to fulfil the Abrahamic promise of blessing all peoples on earth. He “became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14), but he was without sin. His death and resurrection bring reconciliation between God and sinful humankind. There was no more need for the temple in Jerusalem, which Herod the Great started rebuilding in 19 BC, and his son Herod Antipas continued the work. No doubt all the best available technological skills and resources were used to erect such a great and magnificent building.
According to the first-century AD Jewish historian Josephus, Herod undertook the great work of building the temple, “esteeming it to be the most glorious of all his actions, as it really was, to bring it to perfection, and that this would be sufficient for an everlasting memorial of him.” [9] Josephus remarks on the beauty and magnificence of the temple: “Now the outward face of the temple in its front wanted nothing that was likely to surprise either men's minds or their eyes; for it was covered all over with plates of gold of great weight, and, at the first rising of the sun, reflected back a very fiery splendour, and made those who forced themselves to look upon it to turn their eyes away, just as they would have done at the sun's own rays. But this temple appeared to strangers, when they were coming to it at a distance, like a mountain covered with snow; for as to those parts of it that were not gilt, they were exceeding white.” [10]
Jesus’ disciples were awed by the temple: “Look, Teacher! What massive stones! What magnificent buildings!” (Mark 13:1). Jesus’ response was not admiration but a pronouncement of judgment on the temple: “Do you see all these great buildings? Not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down” (13:2). Jesus’ prediction was fulfilled when the temple (which was finally completed in AD 63) was destroyed by the Romans in AD 70. Like the Tower of Babel, Herod’s vanity project came under God’s judgment.
Jesus pronounced judgment on the temple because it had become corrupt and a place for people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. Jesus said to the people in the temple: “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!” (John 2:16). Then he declared, “Destroy this temple and I will raise it again in three days.” John tells us that the temple he had spoken of was his body (2:21). So Jesus’ death on the cross reconciled humankind to God. There was no need for sacrifices to be made in the temple.
The community of God’s people, living under God’s rule, are still responsible “servant kings”. We are to use his gifts and resources to develop technology which can be used for the benefit of all of God’s creation. This may be costly but that is part of the cross that we need to bear when we follow Jesus.
[7] See Wright’s theological presuppositions in Old Testament Ethics for the People of God, 314–321. He suggests four steps to draw principles from OT Law for today: 1) What kind of law is this? 2) Is the law central or peripheral to the overall social structure of Israel? 3) What was the objective/s of the law in Israel? 4) Preserve the objective/s, and move to our context now.
[8] See also Isa. 40:18–19; 44:9–20.
[9] Josephus, Antiquities 380.
[10] Josephus, Jewish Wars 5.5.6


New Creation
The fourth element in our biblical framework is New Creation. In John’s vision in Rev. 22:1–2, he sees “the river the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb through the middle of the street of the city.” It may come as a surprise to find a city in the new heaven and new earth. The reference to “the river of the water of life” takes us back to the creation account in Genesis 2. In the Garden of Eden, there was a garden with a river flowing through it but no city. A city is something made by humans using God-given resources and creativity: a city represents what humankind can do with technology. So to find a city in the new creation suggests that there is a place for technology in the new creation. This is technology redeemed.
But certain groups of people are excluded from the city, as we see from the lists in Rev. 21:8 and Rev. 22:15. Idolaters and liars, those who love and practise falsehood, appear in both of these lists. This should serve as a warning to those who design and develop and use technology like AI, which often perpetuate lies and falsehood and hold out technology as a god to be worshipped.
Conclusion
As we look at humans and their use of God’s gifts and resources in technology from a biblical perspective, it will come as no surprise that all technology, including AI, can be used for good and for harm. Technology is not neutral; the algorithms and the training data used in AI are not neutral. This technology is developed and used by humans who bear the image of God but are sinners at the same time. Thus we must take seriously the limits that God has placed upon humankind in the use of his creative gifts and resources. When building a new house, we must make a parapet!

The author
Dr. Eileen Poh (PhD in Biblical Studies, University of London) was on DTC faculty for over 20 years until her retirement in 2021. She continues to teach at DTC as an adjunct faculty and serves on the alumni committee. Her course, Current Trends in Asia, examines topics like AI, creation care and consumerism, using the biblical-theological framework of creation, fall, redemption and new creation.

